There is a feature of human game studies which, with the addition of this compendium, can no longer honestly be ignored. It is that a large number of individuals producing material in this field are Jews. Axelrod is unmistakably Jewish, by name and appearance, and Poundstone is Jewish too. A number of favourites from Berne's Games People Play are to be featured and Berne is well-known as a Jew.

Poundstone is identified as Jewish by his behaviour: a large proportion of his book Prisoner's Dilemma is devoted to eulogising another Jew, von Morgenstern (confessing along the way that the artistocratic "von" was an affectation, added later). These represent the Jewish (but essentially feminine) tendencies to conspire, change names (Disguised Invasion) and chutzpah. (These latter two have direct feminine analogues in Disguised Defection and Challenges.) This in fact is where I came in: the realization that races could be identified by their behaviour alone caused the media-induced blinkers to fall from my eyes.

So the question must be dealt with: Why do Jews predominate in this area, the basics of human behaviour modelling? As Antonia Jones correctly observed, "the subtleties of game theory lie more in the modelling than in the mathematics." Four reasons immediately present themselves:

1. They appreciate the great importance of this field;
   
   
2. They naturally and instinctively excel at it (that this is a theoretical possibility is obvious, that it is practically to our detriment is equally obvious);
   
   
3. They are saying things only Jews are allowed to say (one group lacks the perspicacity to make such observations; another group stays silent, happy to take advantage of the prevailing situation; another group would be subjected to a hail of accusations of "prejudice," "insensitivity" etc.);
   
   
4. Only the work of Jews is published.

Of course the real giants will be white men (e.g. John Maynard Smith). The Jew is probably congenitally incapable of presenting anything in a straightforward fashion, but sufficient truth must be present to lend credibility to the lies ("All scams have some padding"). For example, Freud appears to have been correct in asserting that everything is ultimately sexual, but his coke-engined volumes set out a system as complicated as the mechanisms they attempt to describe, and project Freud's own Jewish character onto everyone else. Berne's analysis was fundamentally flawed, based on a parent/adult/child tripartite model instead of a male/female dichotomy.

Jews, being emasculated, exercise the female characteristics of foreseeing problems before they arise, obfuscation and (especially Freudian) projection. The importance of behaviour analysis by games is ascertained, so the field is dominated and rendered harmless as a weapon against them by tendentiousness and obfuscation.

Thus, with the work of Jews in particular, careful selection is required and even then the excerpts must be read critically if these pages are not to be spoiled by interjections and supplementary notes. Several early examples are given in illustration:

1. Axelrod, in his discussion of labels, gives the impression of possessing incisive perception by making observations which are patently obvious but which other groups are conditioned to ignore or deny (Item 3 above). After the quoted section he goes on to be disturbed that stereotypes self-reinforce, lamenting that mutual cooperation could have been beneficial etc., while neglecting to mention the potential for exploitation if a deservedly negative stereotype is eroded or unacknowledged. The erroneous 'discount parameter', dealt with in my 'Game-Theoretic Models of Human Behaviour', is mentioned which, however, is a relatively trivial criticism.
   
   
2. Trench Warfare: Axelrod's presumption to have the answers might represent the mechanism of 'creating a problem for the purpose of selling you a solution', of which Creative Transduction is the precursor. For the big picture of Jewish involvement in WWI see Freedman: 'A Jewish Defector Warns America.'
   
   
3. "In this case it is society and not the woman who sets up LYAHF." Here Berne seems to be indulging in his own "Child pastime" version of 'Ain't It Awful.' Of course the ritual exists because men have sensed that this is what women want: two men fighting for her is the ultimate in IoR (Indulgence of Romance). And the woman is not usually impotent in this situation; in fact she is almost invariably the Protagonist.
   
   
4. Uproar: "In degenerate households" – a gentile would have written "In dysfunctional households." This might be an honest slip except that Berne is similarly contemptuous of Christian morality elsewhere.

What are we then to do with the Jews, who by one means or another turn everything on its head? One correspondent accused me of dishonesty, for not admitting that I thought they should all be lined up against a wall and shot, which I so obviously wanted done. The following is a prospective 'Final Solution,' Sheppard's Endlösung, if you will. The Jews can have their homeland, like everyone else, but located on an island with an impenetrable barrier around it to keep them safely isolated from the rest of us. The only thing allowed out will be papers on human games, with the work critically reviewed by a panel of anti-Hebraic scientists before publication.

Would the world yet be safe, I wonder? Or would game analysis be made into a religion, with the Hebes setting themselves as its divine prophets? The Jewish ability to foster myth, create visions of a false utopia, sell worthless stock for a high price etc. is an expression of the feminine policy of promoting a falsely elevated prospect of a payoff in the future. Thus a female maintains a circle of hopeful suitors while only one will succeed.

Added January 2004

Thus behaviour invariably finds its origin in sexual procedures; this is the essence of Procedural Analysis. Smith's and Dawkin's observations, detailed in the 'Cyclical Sex Game' page, are confirmation of this writer's independent conclusion that the male/female game is cyclic.

This male/female cycle can be compared to a pendulum, the path of which has sinusoidal characteristics. We are presently at a feminine extreme, and at such extremes of swing, it is very difficult to detect changes of direction. (The pendulum at its fullest extent has minimum velocity and maximum acceleration.) I believe I have witnessed a change in public attitude twice now, in Holland and Britain, although of course the engines of State will continue with natural inertia. In the coming months or few years it will become increasingly obvious that the feminine State is "running on vapour."